"An independent, fair, and impartial judiciary is indispensable to our system of justice The United States legal system is based upon the principle that an independent, impartial, and competent judiciary, composed of persons of integrity, will interpret and apply the law that governs our society" Masssachusetts Code of Judicial Ethics (2023)
"I have wrote you the want we have of two, or three honest attorneys, if any such thing exist in nature." -Bostonian Edward Randolph in a letter to the Crown (1689) - Massachusetts Historical Society - Library
"If in any town, there is but a single lawyer, he is a pauper, if there are two, they are wealthy." -Ye Olde Truisms - Massachusetts Historical Society
The 7th Amendment:
The Importance of a Civil Jury Trial
"In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to
the rules of the common law."
Federalist Paper No. 83
Hamilton in Support
"The strongest argument in its (a civil jury) favor is, that it
is a security against corruption. As there is always more time and better
opportunity to tamper with a standing body of magistrates than with a jury
summoned for the occasion, there is room to suppose that a corrupt influence
would more easily find its way to the former than to the latter. The force
of this consideration is, however, diminished by others. The sheriff, who is
the summoner of ordinary juries, and the clerks of courts, who have the
nomination of special juries, are themselves standing officers, and, acting
individually, may be supposed more accessible to the touch of corruption
than the judges, who are a collective body. It is not difficult to see, that
it would be in the power of those officers to select jurors who would serve
the purpose of the party as well as a corrupted bench. In the next place, it
may fairly be supposed, that there would be less difficulty in gaining some
of the jurors promiscuously taken from the public mass, than in gaining men
who had been chosen by the government for their probity and good character.
But making every deduction for these considerations, the trial by jury must
still be a valuable check upon corruption." Alexander Hamilton, 1787
OPERATION WRATH OF ESTHER
Today, March 24, 2024, when the Jewish community normally celebrates PURIM - a commenmoration of the devotion of Esther to the immediate and future safety of the Jewish people, will be marked in history as the beginning of the Operation Wrath of Esther - the worldwide execution of all those who aided, abetted and executed the unconscionable atrocities of October 7, 2024 in Israel.
Central to the ability of HAMAS to breach Israel's defenses was the espionage and subtrefege of American abettors associated with the BDS and 2010 Gaza Flotilla organizations. Their extensive espionage from Bar Harbor to San Diego informed HAMAS with the structure of Israel's defenses and ongoing "swarm" defense technologies. Their network through Europe and Lebanon (American University of Beruit) transferred and provided the essential technology and strategy.
History will remember that the Umarian Islamic population of Gaza elected, supported and abetted HAMAS in their unconscionable atrocities - parading a naked Israeli woman in the back of truck - and the wrath of Esther will descend upon them with same fury as it did in ancient times.
IN MY OPINION, OBSERVATION & EXPERIENCE
It is my observation and opinion that the horrific nightmare of October 7, 2024 in Israel and Gaza emerged from the organized anti-Semitism found at MIT, Harvard, Brandeis, Boston College and Woods Hole in the 1970s, and in my personal experience manifest in the continuous acts of Woods Hole Gaza activist Katherine Sheetz and her California attorney daughter; Boston attorney Natasha Lisman who accompanied her husband, Brandeis biologist John Lisman in Woods Hole; and Boston College - Cape Cod attorney Robert Lawless, who conspired with attorney Lisman to protect Robert Mehrabian, president of Teledyne in California.
Danny Casolaro Died FOR YOU
"AMERICAN
CONSPIRACY: The octopus murders"
REACHes NETFLIX'S TOP 10 Docs
"An investigative journalist pursuing a political conspiracy known as the Octopus is found dead in his hotel room. Decades later, new details emerge." NETFLIX
Thirty-three years after freelance journal Danny Casolaro was found with wrists slask in the railroad town of Martinsburg, in the middle of horse country outside Washington, D.C., and a decade after against Jeff Zinn director Danny Casolaro Died For You at the Wellfleet Harbor Actors Theatre (WHAT) on Cape Cod, New York Times photojournalist Christian Hansen has rekindled with new eyes the warning of the late Attorney General and Harvard Law professer Eliot Richardson, who opined in New York Times that: "I believe he was murdered, but even if that is no more than a possibility, it is a possibility with such sinister implications as to demand a serious effort to discover the truth." NYT: A High-Tech Watergate - Oct 21, 1991.
In this four episode docuseries, Hansen and director Zachary Treitz diligently struggle to "untangle the arms of this conspiracy" concluding with an insightful view of the next ridge through the fog of the Shenandoah mountains - a journey we hope, for the safety of our Nation, they will explore in the near future.
Twenty years ago, two LA Times reporters Henry Weinstein and Paul Feldman took a "Murky Perk into a World of Intrigue" LAT, March 21, 1993 touched upon the key players - the board of directors of FIDCO (First Intercontinental Development Corporation) including former White House JAG Michael A. McManus, Jr., his operational lieutenants, Patrick E. Malloy III, Mark & Eileen Mordecai, their attorneys Robert Rachlin and James Rehnquist, and many others.
From the CAPE COD coliseum in 1973
to the
nova music festival in israel - oct 7
THE UNFORSEEN
CONSEQUENCES OF CORRUPTION
To: JULIAN, JOHN M. -- Associate Judge, Barnstable District Court
On March 4, 2023, the Boston Globe reported that “Five residents of a South Yarmouth nursing home [Windsor] died in recent days following an outbreak of COVID-19, which also caused more than 90 additional cases among residents and staff.”[Link]
Almost one year earlier on April 25, 2022, you refused to grant an emergency COVID continuance or electronic appearance during the surge in the Omicron variant and a delay in the booster vaccine for Hebrew Seniorlife Orchard Cove residents where I was a primary aide caring for my 98-year-old Mother, for an administrative hearing on Frederickson's petition BDC 2225cv75, supporting his refusal to renew my 30-year, continuously-renewed Firearms Identification Card (FID). The Continuance was not opposed by Town of Yarmouth's attorney.
At the hearing the next day I did not appear in person, and you chose to preside even though Frederickson is your close friend; that according the Yarmouth Police Facebook page of November 1, 2019 "[you] Judge Julian bleeds DY green and very active with our youth" and you had specific personal knowledge of the relevant facts including those related to Atlantis Weathergear, the Figawi Race and the Edgartown Yacht Club - all factors mandating recusal. The court documents show that you affirmed the Petition's request for a finding of sufficent facts to find "unsuitability".
On June 9, 2022, you issued your formal "Memorandum of Decision". It reads in its entirety:"After a hearing, on April 26, 2022, the Court, (Julian, J) allowed the Plaintiff's petition pursuant M.G.L. c 140, sec 129B (1 ½) (a) based on the fact that the defendant did not appear after notice. The Plaintiff appeared with witness and Court reviewed the filings determined that the Plaintiff met its burden that the Defendant is unsuitable to hold a Firearms Identification Card."
Despite that fact that sec 129B sec 129B (1 ½) (d) reads: "If a court enters a judgment that an applicant is unsuitable the court shall notify the applicant in a writing setting forth the specific reasons for such determination", your Memorandum fails to set forth "the specific reasons [for unsuitability]".
On August 2, 2022, I requested by motion and supporting memorandum your reconsideration of your decisions to deny the Motion of a Continuance, your Refusal to Recuse and your Failure to Set Forth the Specific Reasons for your Finding of Unsuitability". Rather than provide the specific reasons, your response of August 3/4, 2022, in your handwriting reads: "... Court leaves Respondent to their Appellate Rights."
Today, I exercise my Constitutional Rights of Speech and Petition.
The very bedrock of our American freedom and success, embodied in the earliest Massachusetts Bodie of Liberties (1641), is that "Every person within this Jurisdiction, whether Inhabitant or forreiner shall enjoy the same justice and law, that is generall for the plantation, which we constitute and execute one towards another without partialitie or delay" and the current Massachusetts Code of Judicial Ethics which reads: "An independent, fair, [competent] and impartial judiciary is indispensable to our system of justice."
By your refusal to grant a continuance despite the clear danger to the many at the Hebrew SeniorLife Orchard Cove, your refusal to set forth the specific reasons for your finding of "unsuitability", and your reliance on a single, three-year-old EMAIL requesting the assistance a law school dean as "reliable, articulable, and credible information that the applicant has exhibited or engaged in behavior to suggest the applicant could potentially create a risk to public safety", it is my opinion that you no longer exhibit the impartiality, fairness and competency required by our Laws.
Moreover, it is sad that you have refused to vacate your finding of "unsuitability" after my Motion and Memorandum for Reconsideration of June 27, 2022 describing in detail the circumstances of my April 2019 EMAIL to Loyola Law School Dean Michael Waterstone where my 2nd cousin [bm] is a senior law professor requesting his assistance to further the investigation by the Los Angeles Police Department of the murder of my Aunt Dorothy Fox Horwitz and the embezzlement of the Horwitz Estate; the false report by Frederickson to the Canton Police; the subsequent finding of the Canton Police that I posed no risk to public safety; and the pendency of my case, Solomon v Frederickson, USDC 1-20-cv-11894 JDL, in Boston.
It is transparent to all your refusal to grant a continuance and to vacate your default decision of "unsuitability" was a desparate collusion to protect your good friend, Frank Frederickson from criminal liability for conspiracy to intimidate, obstruct and tamper with a victim/witness related to the murder of my Aunt Dorothy and the theft of the rarest of European Judaica.
In addition to the COVID deaths at Windsor Nursing Home in Yarmouth, you may find the pending U.S. Supreme Court case Gonzalez v. Google, USSC No. 21-1333, argued February 21, 2023 [Link] related to the Paris terrorist attack on the Bataclan and the murder of CSU Long Beach student Nohemi Gonzales; the recent US Dept of Energy assessment that COVID19 most likely came from a laboratory[Link]; and the ongoing US House investigation into the Origin of COVID.
For the many reasons aforementioned, I renew my request that you take the extraordinary step to recuse yourself from this matter and vacate your earlier decisions.
Sincerely,
Dennis J Solomon
Yarmouth Port, MA
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Julian's Memorandum of Decision of June 9, 2023
Frederickson's Letter of Denial of FID & Julian Ruling -
PREVIOUS EVENTS
On April 19, 2022, Los Angeles police chief Defendant Moore conspired interstate with Yarmouth, Massachusetts police chief Defendant Frederickson to intimidate and tamper with Plaintiff Solomon by inducing to Canton police officer Moriarty under false pretenses to invade the Hebrew SeniorLife complex Orchard Cove apartment of Plaintiff Solomon's Mother in order to seize, search and interrogate Plaintiff Solomon
In the middle of the night of April 19, 2022 - the first Sedar evening of the Jewish holiday Passover - Canton police officer Moriarty, acting under the false pretenses of ongoing "terrorist activity" provided by Defendants Moore and Frederickson, invaded the privacy and security of the Hebrew SeniorLife complex apartment of Plaintiff Solomon's Mother without a warrant. Officer Moriarty, with his hand nervously on his firearm, then seized, searched and interrogated Solomon regarding said "terrorist activity" before realizing he had been duped into said exigent actions by Frederickson's intentionally false report to the Canton Police.
Concerned by an inquiry from Loyola Law School Dean Michael Waterstone regarding the status of their investigation into the death of my Aunt Dorothy Fox Horwitz, Los Angeles Police chief Michel Moore.
[1]
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/03/04/metro/covid-outbreak-south-yarmouth-nursing-home-leaves-five-dead/
MASSACHUSETTS CANONS OF JUDICIAL ETHICS
The first Canon of judicial ethics is that one recuses when a personal friend appears as a litigant or beneficial party.
Under Massachusetts law, MCJC Canon One requires that "a judge shall uphold and promote the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety."
It is difficult to create a greater "appearance of impropriety" in your collusion with and protection of Frank Frederickson and Philip Magnuson, than to force an adverse party to endanger his 98-year-old Mother with COVID to exercise his Constitution Right to Petition. Only the most depraved would participate in such egregious conduct.